Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW		NS	EW
1 Busch Team	12 Rogers Team	3NT E	5S	9		400		0	0
2 Harris Team	13 Bloore Team	3 E	QD	9		110		7	-7
3 Priol Team	14 Goodwin Team	3 E	QD	9		110		8	-8
4 Perry Team	15 Musgrave Team	1NT E	2H	8		120		-5	5
5 Lorraway Team	16 Gibson Team	3 E	9D	10		130		8	-8
6 Dawes Team	17 Logan Team	3 E	QD	9		110		-4	4
7 Young Team	18 Goddard Team	3NT W	2S	7	100			11	-11
8 Beckett Team	19 Love Team	2 W	2S	9		140		8	-8
9 Cooper Team	20 McLean Team	2 E	2H	11		150		7	-7
10 Mayes Team	21 Vanini Team	2NT E	5S	8		120		-6	6
11 Ruttiman Team	22 Kernke Team	4 W	2S	8	100			2	-2
12 Rogers Team	1 Busch Team	3NT E	5D	9		400		0	0
13 Bloore Team	2 Harris Team	3NT W	8S	9		400		-7	7
14 Goodwin Team	3 Priol Team	3NT W	2S	10		430		-8	8
15 Musgrave Team	4 Perry Team	3NT E	5D	8	50			5	-5
16 Gibson Team	5 Lorraway Team	3NT E	5S	11		460		-8	8
17 Logan Team	6 Dawes Team	3NT E	5D	8	50			4	-4
18 Goddard Team	7 Young Team	3NT E	5D	10		430		-11	11
19 Love Team	8 Beckett Team	3NT E	5D	11		460		-8	8
20 McLean Team	9 Cooper Team	3NT E	5D	10		430		-7	7
21 Vanini Team	10 Mayes Team	3NT W	2S	7	100			6	-6
22 Kernke Team	11 Ruttiman Team	3NT W	6H	8	50			-2	2

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 1
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
3NT by EW	-2	100	2
4 by EW	-2	100	1
3NT by EW	-1	50	2
3NT by EW	-1	50	1
3 by EW	=	-110	3
2NT by EW	=	-120	1
1NT by EW	+1	-120	1
3 by EW	+1	-130	1
2 by EW	+1	-140	1
2 by EW	+3	-150	1
3NT by EW	=	-400	1
3NT by EW	=	-400	2
3NT by EW	+1	-430	1
3NT by EW	+1	-430	2
3NT by EW	+2	-460	2

Alternative display format