Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW		NS	EW
1 Busch Team	8 Beckett Team	3NT W	4D	8	100			0	0
2 Harris Team	16 Gibson Team	2 S	4S	6		100		-7	7
3 Priol Team	15 Musgrave Team	2NT W	9S	5	300			14	-14
4 Perry Team	17 Logan Team	3NT E	JH	8	100			6	-6
5 Lorraway Team	7 Young Team	3NT W	3S	7	200			8	-8
6 Dawes Team	10 Mayes Team	2NT E	QC	7	100			-3	3
7 Young Team	5 Lorraway Team	1NT E	QC	9		150		-8	8
8 Beckett Team	1 Busch Team	3NT W	3S	8	100			0	0
9 Cooper Team	22 Kernke Team	2NT W	4D	8		120		-6	6
10 Mayes Team	6 Dawes Team	3NT W	4D	7	200			3	-3
11 Ruttiman Team	20 McLean Team	2NT W	7D	8		120		-6	6
12 Rogers Team	19 Love Team	2NT W	7D	7	100			7	-7
13 Bloore Team	18 Goddard Team	3NT W	3H	7	200			3	-3
14 Goodwin Team	21 Vanini Team	2NT W	3S	6	200			3	-3
15 Musgrave Team	3 Priol Team	3NT W	4D	9		600		-14	14
16 Gibson Team	2 Harris Team	3NT E	3S	7	200			7	-7
17 Logan Team	4 Perry Team	1NT E	4C	9		150		-6	6
18 Goddard Team	13 Bloore Team	1NT E	QC	6	100			-3	3
19 Love Team	12 Rogers Team	1NT E	4C	10		180		-7	7
20 McLean Team	11 Ruttiman Team	2NT W	3S	7	100			6	-6
21 Vanini Team	14 Goodwin Team	3NT W	QD	8	100			-3	3
22 Kernke Team	9 Cooper Team	5 E	2D	10	100			6	-6

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 9
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
2NT by EW	-3	300	1
3NT by EW	-2	200	1
2NT by EW	-2	200	1
3NT by EW	-2	200	3
2NT by EW	-1	100	1
3NT by EW	-1	100	1
5 by EW	-1	100	1
3NT by EW	-1	100	3
2NT by EW	-1	100	2
1NT by EW	-1	100	1
2 by NS	-2	-100	1
2NT by EW	=	-120	2
1NT by EW	+2	-150	2
1NT by EW	+3	-180	1
3NT by EW	=	-600	1

Alternative display format