Boards Results

HERVEY BAY SWISS TEAMS MAY - MATCH 4

Board No: 29
Dealer: N, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: -400

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks   NS     EW      NS EW

1 Busch Team 3 Priol Team 3 E 3H 9 140 10 -10

2 Harris Team 8 Beckett Team 4 E QC 10 620 0 0

3 Priol Team 1 Busch Team 4 E 5H 10 620 -10 10

4 Perry Team 16 Gibson Team 2 E QC 10 170 10 -10

5 Lorraway Team 11 Ruttiman Team 4 E JC 11 650 -11 11

6 Dawes Team 7 Young Team 3 E QC 9 140 10 -10

7 Young Team 6 Dawes Team 4 E QC 10 620 -10 10

8 Beckett Team 2 Harris Team 4 E QC 10 620 0 0

9 Cooper Team 14 Goodwin Team 4 E 9S 9 100 13 -13

10 Mayes Team 13 Bloore Team 4 E QC 12 680 0 0

11 Ruttiman Team 5 Lorraway Team 2 E 3H 9 140 11 -11

12 Rogers Team 22 Kernke Team 4 E 6C 10 620 1 -1

13 Bloore Team 10 Mayes Team 4 E QC 12 680 0 0

14 Goodwin Team 9 Cooper Team 4 E AD 12 680 -13 13

15 Musgrave Team 18 Goddard Team 4 E 6C 9 100 0 0

16 Gibson Team 4 Perry Team 4 E QC 10 620 -10 10

17 Logan Team 21 Vanini Team 3 E 4H 9 140 3 -3

18 Goddard Team 15 Musgrave Team 4 E 9S 9 100 0 0

19 Love Team 20 McLean Team 4 E AD 12 680 -13 13

20 McLean Team 19 Love Team 4 E QC 9 100 13 -13

21 Vanini Team 17 Logan Team 3 E AD 12 230 -3 3

22 Kernke Team 12 Rogers Team 4 E 3H 11 650 -1 1

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 29
Contract Result Score Frequency
4 by EW -1 100 4
3 by EW = -140 3
2 by EW +1 -140 1
2 by EW +2 -170 1
3 by EW +3 -230 1
4 by EW = -620 6
4 by EW +1 -650 2
4 by EW +2 -680 4

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW	NS	EW
1 Busch Team	3 Priol Team	3 E	3H	9		140	10	-10
2 Harris Team	8 Beckett Team	4 E	QC	10		620	0	0
3 Priol Team	1 Busch Team	4 E	5H	10		620	-10	10
4 Perry Team	16 Gibson Team	2 E	QC	10		170	10	-10
5 Lorraway Team	11 Ruttiman Team	4 E	JC	11		650	-11	11
6 Dawes Team	7 Young Team	3 E	QC	9		140	10	-10
7 Young Team	6 Dawes Team	4 E	QC	10		620	-10	10
8 Beckett Team	2 Harris Team	4 E	QC	10		620	0	0
9 Cooper Team	14 Goodwin Team	4 E	9S	9	100		13	-13
10 Mayes Team	13 Bloore Team	4 E	QC	12		680	0	0
11 Ruttiman Team	5 Lorraway Team	2 E	3H	9		140	11	-11
12 Rogers Team	22 Kernke Team	4 E	6C	10		620	1	-1
13 Bloore Team	10 Mayes Team	4 E	QC	12		680	0	0
14 Goodwin Team	9 Cooper Team	4 E	AD	12		680	-13	13
15 Musgrave Team	18 Goddard Team	4 E	6C	9	100		0	0
16 Gibson Team	4 Perry Team	4 E	QC	10		620	-10	10
17 Logan Team	21 Vanini Team	3 E	4H	9		140	3	-3
18 Goddard Team	15 Musgrave Team	4 E	9S	9	100		0	0
19 Love Team	20 McLean Team	4 E	AD	12		680	-13	13
20 McLean Team	19 Love Team	4 E	QC	9	100		13	-13
21 Vanini Team	17 Logan Team	3 E	AD	12		230	-3	3
22 Kernke Team	12 Rogers Team	4 E	3H	11		650	-1	1

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 29
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
4 by EW	-1	100	4
3 by EW	=	-140	3
2 by EW	+1	-140	1
2 by EW	+2	-170	1
3 by EW	+3	-230	1
4 by EW	=	-620	6
4 by EW	+1	-650	2
4 by EW	+2	-680	4

QUEENSLAND EVENTS