Boards Results

NOOSA SEPTEMBER TEAMS 2019 - MATCH 6

Board No: 26
Dealer: E, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: -640

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks   NS     EW      NS EW

1 WARD Team 4 DAWSON Team 5 E KD 11 650 -11 11

2 TOUTON Team 3 GREEN Team 2 E 9S 12 230 10 -10

3 GREEN Team 2 TOUTON Team 4 E 9S 12 680 -10 10

4 DAWSON Team 1 WARD Team 4 S AH 9 100 11 -11

5 JAKES Team 7 STONEMAN Team 5 W QC 11 650 1 -1

6 ANDREW Team 18 POWLEY Team 4 E 9S 12 680 1 -1

7 STONEMAN Team 5 JAKES Team 4 E TC 12 680 -1 1

8 JONES Team 20 WAGNER Team 5 S AH 11 600 15 -15

9 BECKETT Team 10 HAWKINS Team 4 W 5D 12 680 -1 1

10 HAWKINS Team 9 BECKETT Team 4 E KD 11 650 1 -1

11 FRENCH Team 12 ROBERTSON Team 4 E TH 12 680 -1 1

12 ROBERTSON Team 11 FRENCH Team 4 E KD 11 650 1 -1

13 CORDINER Team 14 WRIGHT Team 4 E TH 12 680 0 0

14 WRIGHT Team 13 CORDINER Team 4 E TH 12 680 0 0

15 POWER Team 16 ANDERSON Team 4 E TH 13 710 -1 1

16 ANDERSON Team 15 POWER Team 5 E TC 12 680 1 -1

17 NORTHEY Team 19 SMITH Team 4 E TH 12 680 -1 1

18 POWLEY Team 6 ANDREW Team 4 E 2D 13 710 -1 1

19 SMITH Team 17 NORTHEY Team 4 E TH 11 650 1 -1

20 WAGNER Team 8 JONES Team 5 E 5C 11 650 -15 15

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 26
Contract Result Score Frequency
5 by NS = 600 1
4 by NS -1 -100 1
2 by EW +4 -230 1
5 by EW = -650 1
5 by EW = -650 2
4 by EW +1 -650 2
4 by EW +1 -650 1
5 by EW +1 -680 1
4 by EW +2 -680 2
4 by EW +2 -680 5
4 by EW +2 -680 1
4 by EW +3 -710 2

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW	NS	EW
1 WARD Team	4 DAWSON Team	5 E	KD	11		650	-11	11
2 TOUTON Team	3 GREEN Team	2 E	9S	12		230	10	-10
3 GREEN Team	2 TOUTON Team	4 E	9S	12		680	-10	10
4 DAWSON Team	1 WARD Team	4 S	AH	9		100	11	-11
5 JAKES Team	7 STONEMAN Team	5 W	QC	11		650	1	-1
6 ANDREW Team	18 POWLEY Team	4 E	9S	12		680	1	-1
7 STONEMAN Team	5 JAKES Team	4 E	TC	12		680	-1	1
8 JONES Team	20 WAGNER Team	5 S	AH	11	600		15	-15
9 BECKETT Team	10 HAWKINS Team	4 W	5D	12		680	-1	1
10 HAWKINS Team	9 BECKETT Team	4 E	KD	11		650	1	-1
11 FRENCH Team	12 ROBERTSON Team	4 E	TH	12		680	-1	1
12 ROBERTSON Team	11 FRENCH Team	4 E	KD	11		650	1	-1
13 CORDINER Team	14 WRIGHT Team	4 E	TH	12		680	0	0
14 WRIGHT Team	13 CORDINER Team	4 E	TH	12		680	0	0
15 POWER Team	16 ANDERSON Team	4 E	TH	13		710	-1	1
16 ANDERSON Team	15 POWER Team	5 E	TC	12		680	1	-1
17 NORTHEY Team	19 SMITH Team	4 E	TH	12		680	-1	1
18 POWLEY Team	6 ANDREW Team	4 E	2D	13		710	-1	1
19 SMITH Team	17 NORTHEY Team	4 E	TH	11		650	1	-1
20 WAGNER Team	8 JONES Team	5 E	5C	11		650	-15	15

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 26
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
5 by NS	=	600	1
4 by NS	-1	-100	1
2 by EW	+4	-230	1
5 by EW	=	-650	1
5 by EW	=	-650	2
4 by EW	+1	-650	2
4 by EW	+1	-650	1
5 by EW	+1	-680	1
4 by EW	+2	-680	2
4 by EW	+2	-680	5
4 by EW	+2	-680	1
4 by EW	+3	-710	2

QUEENSLAND EVENTS