Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW		NS	EW
1 STEFFENSEN Team	32 RANKE Team	3 W	KC	11		200		10	-10
2 BERGER Team	21 MCDONALD Team	3 W	KC	11		200		0	0
3 POWIS Team	35 MANDER Team	4 E	AC	10		620		1	-1
4 PISKO Team	34 MARKOVIC Team	3 W	KC	10		130		-6	6
5 SAWYER Team	30 REID Team	5 N	QH	9		100		1	-1
6 STRONG Team	27 JACKSON Team	5 W	KC	11		600		-10	10
7 SEAR Team	23 ROSS-JOHNSON Team	4 W	4S	9	100			13	-13
8 FORSYTH Team	26 GOSNEY Team	4 W	KC	11		650		4	-4
9 MCIVER Team	22 BRAITHWAITE Team	4 E	AC	11		650		-10	10
10 STEINWEDEL Team	24 HOCKING Team	3 W	KC	11		200		10	-10
11 LUCK Team	36 THOMSON Team	3 N	QH	10	130			7	-7
12 JESSEP Team	28 NIGHTINGALE Team	3 W	KC	12		230		9	-9
13 KENT Team	25 ASKEW Team	3 W	KC	11		150		2	-2
14 MISIOR Team	33 ZHOU Team	3 W	KC	11		200		-2	2
15 MILLER Team	29 TUXWORTH Team	4 E	AC	11		650		-11	11
16 BOGATIE Team	20 CHANG Team	3 W	4S	9		140		2	-2
17 HYMUS Team	19 FRANCIS Team	5X N	QH	9		300		-6	6
18 MOORE Team	31 HODGES Team	4 N	QH	9		50		4	-4
19 FRANCIS Team	17 HYMUS Team	4 N	QH	9		50		6	-6
20 CHANG Team	16 BOGATIE Team	3 W	KC	11		200		-2	2
21 MCDONALD Team	2 BERGER Team	3 W	KC	11		200		0	0
22 BRAITHWAITE Team	9 MCIVER Team	3 W	KC	11		200		10	-10
23 ROSS-JOHNSON Team	7 SEAR Team	4 W	4S	12		680		-13	13
24 HOCKING Team	10 STEINWEDEL Team	4 W	KC	12		680		-10	10
25 ASKEW Team	13 KENT Team	2 W	QC	11		200		-2	2
26 GOSNEY Team	8 FORSYTH Team	4X W	2H	10		790		-4	4
27 JACKSON Team	6 STRONG Team	1 W	QC	9		140		10	-10
28 NIGHTINGALE Team	12 JESSEP Team	4 W	KC	11		650		-9	9
29 TUXWORTH Team	15 MILLER Team	5 N	QH	9		100		11	-11
30 REID Team	5 SAWYER Team	3 W	KC	9		140		-1	1
31 HODGES Team	18 MOORE Team	3 W	KC	11		200		-4	4
32 RANKE Team	1 STEFFENSEN Team	4 W	KC	11		650		-10	10
33 ZHOU Team	14 MISIOR Team	3 W	KC	11		150		2	-2
34 MARKOVIC Team	4 PISKO Team	6 W	KC	11	100			6	-6
35 MANDER Team	3 POWIS Team	4 W	KC	11		650		-1	1
36 THOMSON Team	11 LUCK Team	3 W	KC	9		140		-7	7

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 6
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
3 by NS	+1	130	1
6 by EW	-1	100	1
4 by EW	-1	100	1
4 by NS	-1	-50	2
5 by NS	-2	-100	2
3 by EW	+1	-130	1
3 by EW	=	-140	3
1 by EW	+2	-140	1
3 by EW	+2	-150	2
3 by EW	+2	-200	8
2 by EW	+3	-200	1
3 by EW	+3	-230	1
5X by NS	-2	-300	1
5 by EW	=	-600	1
4 by EW	=	-620	1
4 by EW	+1	-650	2
4 by EW	+1	-650	4
4 by EW	+2	-680	2
4X by EW	=	-790	1

Alternative display format