Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW		NS	EW
9 Cooper Team	1 Busch Team	2 W	AD	8		110		-6	6
14 Goodwin Team	2 Harris Team	1NT W	4D	6	50			-2	2
12 Rogers Team	3 Priol Team	1 E	2H	7		80		-5	5
8 Beckett Team	4 Perry Team	2NT S	JS	9	150			2	-2
18 Goddard Team	5 Lorraway Team	2 E	QD	6	100			2	-2
13 Bloore Team	6 Dawes Team	1NT W	4D	6	50			-1	1
10 Mayes Team	7 Young Team	1NT W	KD	9		150		-5	5
4 Perry Team	8 Beckett Team	2NT W	4D	6	100			-2	2
1 Busch Team	9 Cooper Team	2NT W	2D	5	150			6	-6
7 Young Team	10 Mayes Team	1NT W	4D	6	50			5	-5
15 Musgrave Team	11 Ruttiman Team	2 N	AS	9	110			0	0
3 Priol Team	12 Rogers Team	1NT W	2D	5	100			5	-5
6 Dawes Team	13 Bloore Team	2 N	AS	8	90			1	-1
2 Harris Team	14 Goodwin Team	2 S	JS	8	110			2	-2
11 Ruttiman Team	15 Musgrave Team	1NT W	7D	5	100			0	0
19 Love Team	16 Gibson Team	2 N	AS	7		50		-6	6
20 McLean Team	17 Logan Team	2NT E	2H	8		120		1	-1
5 Lorraway Team	18 Goddard Team	1NT W	2D	6	50			-2	2
16 Gibson Team	19 Love Team	2NT W	9H	4	200			6	-6
17 Logan Team	20 McLean Team	1NT W	KD	9		150		-1	1
22 Kernke Team	21 Vanini Team	2 E	2H	6	100			2	-2
21 Vanini Team	22 Kernke Team	2 E	QD	7	50			-2	2

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 24
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
2NT by EW	-4	200	1
2NT by EW	-3	150	1
2NT by NS	+1	150	1
2 by NS	=	110	1
2 by NS	+1	110	1
1NT by EW	-2	100	2
2NT by EW	-2	100	1
2 by EW	-2	100	2
2 by NS	=	90	1
1NT by EW	-1	50	4
2 by EW	-1	50	1
2 by NS	-1	-50	1
1 by EW	=	-80	1
2 by EW	=	-110	1
2NT by EW	=	-120	1
1NT by EW	+2	-150	2

Alternative display format