Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW		NS	EW
11 Ruttiman Team	4 Perry Team	2 N	JD	10	170			2	-2
15 Musgrave Team	6 Dawes Team	3 S	8S	11	150			1	-1
1 Busch Team	2 Harris Team	2 N	4D	9	110			1	-1
22 Kernke Team	19 Love Team	2 N	2C	9	140			-6	6
5 Lorraway Team	13 Bloore Team	2 N	9D	9	140			0	0
7 Young Team	9 Cooper Team	2 S	3C	9	110			-1	1
8 Beckett Team	14 Goodwin Team	2 N	JD	9	140			-4	4
16 Gibson Team	12 Rogers Team	2 N	JD	9	140			-4	4
13 Bloore Team	5 Lorraway Team	3 S	4H	10	130			0	0
2 Harris Team	1 Busch Team	2 S	TC	8	90			-1	1
21 Vanini Team	20 McLean Team	2 N	4C	8	110			4	-4
18 Goddard Team	17 Logan Team	4 S	3C	10	130			-7	7
17 Logan Team	18 Goddard Team	3NT N	3H	9	400			7	-7
9 Cooper Team	7 Young Team	3 N	2C	9	140			1	-1
6 Dawes Team	15 Musgrave Team	2 N	JD	8	110			-1	1
4 Perry Team	11 Ruttiman Team	2 N	2C	8	110			-2	2
3 Priol Team	10 Mayes Team	3NT N	5H	9	400			10	-10
10 Mayes Team	3 Priol Team	2 N	2C	7		50		-10	10
20 McLean Team	21 Vanini Team	3 S	6C	8		50		-4	4
14 Goodwin Team	8 Beckett Team	1NT E	AD	4	300			4	-4
12 Rogers Team	16 Gibson Team	1NT E	AD	4	300			4	-4
19 Love Team	22 Kernke Team	1NT E	AD	3	400			6	-6

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 6
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
1NT by EW	-4	400	1
3NT by NS	=	400	2
1NT by EW	-3	300	2
2 by NS	+2	170	1
3 by NS	+2	150	1
3 by NS	=	140	1
2 by NS	+1	140	4
4 by NS	=	130	1
3 by NS	+1	130	1
2 by NS	=	110	3
2 by NS	+1	110	1
2 by NS	+1	110	1
2 by NS	=	90	1
2 by NS	-1	-50	1
3 by NS	-1	-50	1

Alternative display format